Skip to content

HEAD-TO-HEAD

TwitterAPIs vs Scrapingdog: The 5x Credit Multiplier Explained

TwitterAPIs is a pay-per-call Twitter and X data API that returns typed results at $0.0008 per call with no monthly plan. Scrapingdog is a general-purpose web scraping platform sold as a monthly subscription from $40, and it bills its Twitter Scraper API at 5 credits per request, so a plan's headline credit count is five times the number of Twitter requests it actually buys. Below roughly 500,000 requests a month we are cheaper. Above it, Scrapingdog's $350 Premium tier can undercut us, and we would rather say so than hide it.

How we source these numbers

Every Scrapingdog figure here was read from scrapingdog.com/pricing on 6 August 2026, including the per-endpoint credit costs, which they publish openly. Our own rates come from our public pricing page. We have shown the volume where Scrapingdog wins rather than choosing three scenarios that all favour us, because a comparison that never concedes anything is not worth reading.

Side by side

The second row is the one people miss when they compare plan sizes.

DimensionTwitterAPIsScrapingdog
Pricing modelPay per call, $0.0008 per read, no planMonthly subscription with a credit allowance
Cost of one Twitter request1 call, $0.00085 credits per request on the Twitter Scraper API
Entry price$0, top-ups from $10$0 free tier (200 credits), then $40/mo Lite
Free tier size$0.50 in credits, about 625 calls200 credits, about 40 Twitter requests at 5 credits each
Twitter surface51 documented Twitter and X endpointsOne Twitter Scraper API among many site scrapers
Unused allowanceCredits never expireMonthly allowance, resets with the billing cycle

Three volumes, including the one we lose

Scrapingdog credits shown are Twitter requests multiplied by five.

Prototype

2,000 Twitter requests in a month

TwitterAPIs

About $1.60

2,000 x $0.0008. No plan needed.

Scrapingdog

$40

10,000 credits at 5 per request. Well inside Lite's 200,000, but Lite is the entry point so $40 is the floor.

Production

50,000 Twitter requests per month

TwitterAPIs

About $40.00

50,000 x $0.0008.

Scrapingdog

$90

250,000 credits needed at 5 per request, which exceeds Lite's 200,000, so this lands on Standard at $90.

Scale

500,000 Twitter requests per month

TwitterAPIs

About $400

500,000 x $0.0008.

Scrapingdog

$350

2.5M credits at 5 per request, which fits Premium at $350/mo for 6M credits.

A scraper returns markup, an API returns a contract

This is the difference that costs the most and shows up on no pricing page. A scraper API hands back what the page gave it. When Twitter changes its markup, your parser breaks, and finding out usually means noticing that a field went quietly empty rather than seeing an error. A dedicated API returns typed fields against a documented contract, so a tweet object has the same shape next month as it does today, and a breaking change is our problem before it is yours.

Scrapingdog is a good general scraping platform, and if your work spans Google, LinkedIn, Amazon and the open web, one vendor for all of it beats four integrations. The case for us is narrower and simpler: if Twitter and X are the job, you should not be maintaining a parser.

What one request costs

1curl -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
2 "https://api.twitterapis.com/twitter/tweet/advanced_search?query=AI&count=20"
3
4# $0.0008. One call is one call.
5# Typed JSON against a documented schema, no HTML to parse.

Other comparisons worth reading

Each vendor loses on a different axis, so the one that matters depends on how you buy. These three cover the rest of the field.

Start with $0.50 in free credits

No subscription and no credit multiplier to reason about. One call costs $0.0008 whatever endpoint it hits.

Frequently asked questions

Scrapingdog prices by difficulty. A plain HTML page is 1 credit, JavaScript rendering is 5, premium proxies are 10, and the LinkedIn Post API is 25. The Twitter Scraper API sits at 5 credits per request. The multiplier is reasonable given what it takes to render those pages, but it means the headline credit count on a plan is not the number of Twitter requests you get. Divide by five.

A scraper API returns whatever the page gave it, and you own the parsing and the breakage when the markup changes. A dedicated Twitter API returns typed fields against a documented contract. We publish 51 endpoints with stable response shapes, so a tweet object has the same fields today and next month.

When Twitter is one of several targets. If you also need Google results, LinkedIn posts, Amazon listings and general web pages, one account covering all of them is genuinely simpler than stitching together four vendors. If Twitter and X are the whole job, a dedicated API is cheaper below scale and gives you a contract instead of markup.

It can be. At 500,000 Twitter requests a month, Scrapingdog's Premium plan at $350 undercuts our $400. We would rather say that plainly than pretend otherwise. The crossover sits somewhere around the high hundreds of thousands of requests, and below it the subscription floor works against you. If you are reliably above that line every single month, price both.

Yes, 200 credits. At 5 credits per Twitter request that is about 40 requests, which is enough to see a response but not to test pagination or error handling properly. Our free credit is $0.50, roughly 625 calls, which is enough to run a real integration test before deciding.